Arguments against re-development of
North Weald Airfield for housing
· The planned development would mean
the loss of an important, historic and unique facility for aviation and leisure
users in this part of the country.
· North Weald Airfield has immense historical
value, having been established in 1916 to defend
· It would change the character of
North Weald Bassett for existing residents beyond recognition.
· It would place a huge burden on the
local infrastructure, despite some of the additional road and transport links
planned.
· It would also mean the loss of an
important breathing space between the village and the M11.
· The huge increase in infrastructure
required to support the planned housing development would have an immense
impact on the local environment.
· There is no other airfield in the
region with such facilities and length of hard runway in the region available
to General Aviation users.
· The development is against the
principles of Planning Policy Guidance No 13 (PPG 13), which limits
development in and around existing aerodromes, which would be in conflict
with existing operations at these airfields.
· The part of the airfield,
which is earmarked for housing, is Green Belt
Land. Plans to re-designate it into Brownfield land
is contradictory to recommendations PPG 3 Annex C Para 2. This
document clearly outlines which curtilage which may
be re-designated. To quote:
· "..this
does not mean that the whole area of the curtilage
should therefore be redeveloped. For example, where the footprint of a building
only occupies a proportion of a site of which the remainder is open land (such
as at an airfield or a hospital) the whole site should not normally be
developed to the boundary of the curtilage."
· Apart from its expanded use for many
leisure activities, the airfield could also be further developed as an
important transport facility for light aviation, both for leisure and business
travel by air, if managed and developed for this purpose in the correct manner.
· Light general aviation has been all
but squeezed out of the major airports in the region and due to other airfield closures, existing business airports cannot cope with the
demand. North Weald,
however has the potential for investment to provide much needed GA and Business
Aviation facilities.
· A major housing development as
envisaged for North Weald Airfield could also take place spread over a number
of smaller sites in the region, with less impact on existing communities and
without the loss of such a valuable facility.
There is no shortage of low use, idle land available, even if not all of
it is in the public domain. The planners
should consider more options making use of such land.
NWAUG suggests that you re-write the above arguments in your
own words, as “carbon-copy” responses may have less impact. Of course you should add any further arguments
and points of your own (we would be pleased to hear them), and you don’t have
to use all the above if you disagree with any of them.